The proposed changes previously approved by the Commission are included and indicated in single strikethrough/single underline text. The proposed changes that require approval of the Commission are indicated in double strikethrough/double underline highlighted text to ease the review process. The reasons for the newly proposed changes are as follows:
- Changed all “pilot program” references to “pilot presentation” for consistency with existing language.
- Added “amended” before “curriculum” for consistency with existing language.
- Modified the referenced Regulation sections to reflect only those sections that include requirements impacting certification of a pilot presentation.
- Clarified the process has been established for both the approval and implementation of a pilot presentation.
- Reversed the order of process steps 2 and 3. Determining the need for a pilot presentation should come before approval by the Executive Director and Commission.
- Moved “meets stakeholder needs” from the step 2 introductory sentence to factor A.
- Reworded step 3 (now step 2) for clarity purposes.
- Added factors to step 2 in order to clarify what POST will be looking at when determining whether or not to move forward with a pilot presentation.
- Reworded step 4 for clarity purposes.
- Removed from step 4 the portion of the sentence stating: “will apply to all individuals attending the pilot course.”.This language currently exists in the Regulation.
- Clarified what the term requirements means in step 5.
|