POST staff have been made aware of courses in which instructors have attended a portion of a POST-certified course as a student while also acting in the capacity of an instructor for a small portion/module of instruction. Although, these infrequent instances appear to have happened due to the best of intentions, the situation identified the need for POST to provide clarity on this in order to ensure individuals participating can focus their undivided attention on the learning environment as either instructors or students. Further, these few instances were not in violation of POST Regulation, as the language in its current state does not address such circumstances. There was also additional concern for the potential for the individual to be reimbursed twice - as student and instructor.
At the June 18, 2020 Commission meeting, POST staff brought forth a proposed amendment to Regulation 1052(a)(5) to address this potential issue. At that time, POST Staff proposed to amend Regulation 1052 to be explicit in excluding instructors from also being students in the courses they were instructing, with special presentations such as workshops, symposiums, etc. being the only exceptions. Commissioner Braziel had some concerns regarding the inability for individuals to receive partial credit for courses in which they are both instructor and enrolled student. He requested that this topic be revisited at the current Commission meeting.
POST Staff have conducted additional review and found the following issues:
1) How does POST ensure that instructors are truly qualified to teach?
2) How does POST recognize and ensure it does not penalize subject matter experts for their skills?
3) How does POST ensure State funds are not double billed?
4) How can POST make reasonable allowances for individuals to receive partial credit for courses in which they are simultaneously instructing and enrolled as a student?
POST staff propose amending Regulation 1052(a)(5) to adopt (A) to include language to identify instructor qualifications through successful completion of POST-certified courses within a subject, or successful completion of non-POST-certified courses within a subject, that meet equivalency of core content comparison/review, or significant experience successfully practicing the skill or working within the subject matter (e.g.: a trained psychologist who has not completed any POST-certified courses teaching a course in officer wellness).
Additionally, POST staff propose amending Regulation 1052(a)(5) to adopt (B) to include language to stipulate that instructors may not receive course credit for any module in which they are the instructor but may be eligible to receive credit for any remaining modules of instruction in the course or even in which they are a registered attending and not providing instruction. |