Meetings
 
 
Print
AGENDA ITEM REPORT

Title: Definition of Serious Misconduct
REPORT PROFILE
MEETING DATE
4/7/2022
BUREAU SUBMITTING THIS REPORT
RESEARCHED BY (PRINT NAME)
Jackie Nelson
REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME)
Maria Sandoval
REPORT DATE
03/15/2022
APPROVED BY
Manuel Alvarez, Jr.
DATE APPROVED
03/22/22
PURPOSE
Information Only
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No

ISSUE:
BACKGROUND:

On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 2 (SB 2) into law. This bill is intended to increase accountability for misconduct and codify a process for certification, suspension, and decertification of peace officers in the State of California.

Senate Bill 2 states the Commission on POST shall adopt by regulation, a definition of “serious misconduct” that shall serve as the criteria to be considered for ineligibility for, or revocation of, certification as a peace officer.  This definition shall minimally include all of the following:

1) Dishonesty relating to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime, or relating to the reporting of, or investigation of misconduct by, a peace officer or custodial officer, including, but not limited to, false statements, intentionally filing false reports, tampering with, falsifying, destroying, or concealing evidence, perjury, and tampering with data recorded by a body-worn camera or other recording device for purposes of concealing misconduct.

2) Abuse of power, including, but not limited to, intimidating witnesses, knowingly obtaining a false confession, and knowingly making a false arrest.

3) Physical abuse, including, but not limited to, the excessive or unreasonable use of force.

4) Sexual assault as described in subdivision (b) of Section 832.7.

5) Demonstrating bias on the basis of race, national origin, religion, gender identity or expression, housing status, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, or other protected status in violation of law or department policy or inconsistent with a peace officer’s obligation to carry out their duties in a fair and unbiased manner. This paragraph does not limit an employee’s rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

6) Acts that violate the law and are sufficiently egregious or repeated as to be inconsistent with a peace officer’s obligation to uphold the law or respect the rights of members of the public, as determined by the commission. Whether a particular factual or legal determination in a prior appeal proceeding shall have preclusive effect in proceedings under this chapter shall be governed by the existing law of collateral estoppel.

7) Participation in a law enforcement gang. For the purpose of this paragraph, a “law enforcement gang” means a group of peace officers within a law enforcement agency who may identify themselves by a name and may be associated with an identifying symbol, including, but not limited to, matching tattoos, and who engage in a pattern of on-duty behavior that intentionally violates the law or fundamental principles of professional policing, including, but not limited to, excluding, harassing, or discriminating against any individual based on a protected category under federal or state antidiscrimination laws, engaging in or promoting conduct that violates the rights of other employees or members of the public, violating agency policy, the persistent practice of unlawful detention or use of excessive force in circumstances where it is known to be unjustified, falsifying police reports, fabricating or destroying evidence, targeting persons for enforcement based solely on protected characteristics of those persons, theft, unauthorized use of alcohol or drugs on duty, unlawful or unauthorized protection of other members from disciplinary actions, and retaliation against other officers who threaten or interfere with the activities of the group.

8) Failure to cooperate with an investigation into potential police misconduct, including an investigation conducted pursuant to this chapter. For purposes of this paragraph, the lawful exercise of rights granted under the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, or any other law shall not be considered a failure to cooperate.

9) Failure to intercede when present and observing another officer using force that is clearly beyond that which is necessary, as determined by an objectively reasonable officer under the circumstances, taking into account the possibility that other officers may have additional information regarding the threat posed by a subject.

 

ANALYSIS:

On January 11-12, 2022, and January 27, 2022, POST held two workshops to obtain constructive input from stakeholder groups regarding the definition of serious misconduct. One workgroup represented law enforcement and one workgroup represented varying community groups. The two workgroups provided additional language for the Commission to consider as it works to establish regulation required by statute. A side-by-side breakdown of suggestions from the two workgroups are provided for the Commission’s review and discussion.

The Commission may consider any of the following actions but may take other actions as appropriate:

  • Incorporate input from the workgroups, if deemed applicable.
  • Expand on the definition of serious misconduct to further define the 9 areas of misconduct or adding additional areas of misconduct not currently identified in SB 2.
  • Adopt the definition of serious misconduct as written in SB 2.

Additional attachments to this agenda item include the working documents presented to each of the workgroups for review and consideration.

RECOMMENDATION:

Penal Code Section 13510.8 states the Commission shall formulate a definition of “serious misconduct” and provide direction to POST staff for establishing a definition in regulation.

 
ATTACHMENT(S):
Name: Type:
SB2.pdf Cover Memo
Assembly_Floor_Analysis.pdf Cover Memo
Senate_Floor_Analysis.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Arizona.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Connecticut.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Florida.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Hawaii.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Minnesota.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Montana.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Oregon.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Utah.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Vermont.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Washington.pdf Cover Memo
Integrity_Bulletin_-_Wyoming.pdf Cover Memo
LD_42_V-6.5.pdf Cover Memo
LD42_TTS_-_Cultural_Diversity-Discrimination.pdf Cover Memo
Use_Of_Force_Standards_Guidelines.pdf Cover Memo
Workshop_Attendees.pdf Cover Memo
COMPARISON_V3_-_Serious_Misconduct_Definitions_Workshop_Recomemendations.docx Cover Memo